Last month the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources held their Spring Rules Hearings in each county across the state. The hearings gave the public a chance to cast a vote in questions regarding management of a variety of natural resources. I have looked at the data to see how southeast Wisconsin voted on fisheries issues in comparison to the rest of the state. The five counties (Kenosha , Milwaukee , Ozaukee, Sheboygan and Racine), typically voted the same way as the rest of state. On the most hyped question of the ballot, voters said no to allowing trolling statewide. The narrow margin of victory for no voters was represented in the southeast by split in the countywide votes, with Kenosha , Racine and Waukesha voting yes and Milwaukee , Ozaukee and Sheboygan voting no. In another close result, the majority statewide said yes to a lead tackle restriction on Enscanaba, Nebish and Pallette lakes in Vilas County . All the counties in the southeast, except Milwaukee , voted no.
Some counties also had one or two votes that didn’t go along with the statewide majority. Except for the two questions above, Racine , Sheboygan and Waukesha voted with the statewide majority on every fisheries-related question. Kenosha said no to allowing panfish bag limits split by species and allowing alternating length and bag limits under certain conditions, contrary to the majority. Ozaukee was undecided about the latter question as their vote was tied on that one. Ozaukee also voted down length and bag limits for walleye on Silver Lake in Barron Country. If anybody knows why Ozaukee residents care so much about a lake on the other side of the state, please let me know. Finally, Milwaukee voted no on eliminating Inland Trout and Great Lakes Stamps for 16-17 year old youth. I think voters must have been confused by the wording of this question because it was a close vote statewide and I don’t see why anybody would vote no on eliminating the stamp requirement for 16-17 year old youth and save young anglers some money.